smokeless powder Secrets
smokeless powder Secrets
Blog Article
I'm not guaranteed of the chemical make-up on the substance that locked up my .forty five Colt Marlin After i made an effort to sneak 10 rounds of 3Fg BP via it at some point, but 6 rounds in it locked up with the the blackest and stickiest crap I have ever observed.
With classic powders, I did take a look at some classic loading manuals and located some variances in recommended load...in all probability in the powder recipe transforming a little about thirty many years.
If you would be so variety, I will be extremely serious about figuring out the recipe for one of those Smokeless hundreds that don't have a peak strain that is greater than any BP load. 8700 is with regards to the slowest that I know of, and has a small strain like BP, but I feel that even it has a entrance close peak that much exceeds BP.
Alcoholic beverages and ether were being then evaporated from "environmentally friendly" powder grains to the remaining solvent focus between three p.c for rifle powders and seven % for large artillery powder grains. Burning charge is inversely proportional to solvent concentration. Grains had been coated with electrically conductive graphite to minimize technology of static energy during subsequent Mixing.
This kind of powder has granules which have been shaped like small discs. They are really primarily powder that may be extended into a tube form and Slice into tiny sections, Virtually like slicing a very small summertime sausage.
Posted January two, 2012 Trailrider, your Observe about more rapidly burning powders in massive volume circumstances becoming position delicate is usually the case and I've expert it myself. Once i was Doing the job up masses with Special powering 350 grain bullets that is what precisely I envisioned to discover. Having said that, I used to be surpised to find that wasn't the case. Velocity and velocity standard deviations weren't statistically distinctive for rounds While using the powder near the rear of the situation and people with powder near the entrance of the situation.
Thunder River Renegades Posted April 27, 2023 It's not necessarily just about barrels and metal and rifles. Revolvers made for black powder cartridges shouldn't be shot with smokeless cartridges. I do not believe that is "1950ish regurgitated crud." Gun suppliers of the time went to the trouble of marking barrels "32 S&W CTGE" or "38 S&W CTGE" to differentiate versions in their revolvers which were Secure for smokeless powder from past variations that were not.
Whilst I've employed 3031 and located it Alright, I've more knowledge with H322 in major hundreds and it really works extremely properly, it is a keeper. I also on a regular basis use H4198 in a little lighter (moderately hefty loads) with very good final results. I have a couple pounds of AA5744 around the shelf earmarked to try inside the 45-70 but have not however attempted it. My Dad shoots A lot lighter 45-70 hundreds in his Rolling Block and it has had very good luck with Exclusive and 2400.
It's out-of-day as it lacks facts on Path Manager. As envisioned it reveals shotgun powders like Clays, seven-hundred-X and Pink Dot as owning low bulk densities. Distinctive is a little more dense compared to the quicker shotgun powders but not by A lot.
I think this book is out of print now. It seems like Keep track of of your Wolf has some copies within the connection Garrison Joe delivered.
Posted April 27, 2023 That seams confusing. Smokeless powder arrived out to be used in revolvers in 1894 by both equally Dupont and Laflin & Rand Along with the "Bulk for Bulk" powders...eleven yrs following the Colt design 73' "black powder body" revolvers were being launched. Bullseye powder for revolvers was launched only three years afterwards in 1897. Very little was at any time mentioned for virtually 24 yrs of applying bulk for bulk powder, but nonetheless only after three decades of Bullseye...and by 1900, the "not for pistols" built It is really way through the land right until not less than 1906 and given that 1909 by Winchester...Regardless that Winchester continue to applied the exact same "bulk for bulk" powder that designed Significantly less Stress than black powder. Why did Colt hold out so very long for "enhancements"? Not sure exactly what is so really hard about comprehension this sort of data. Bulk for Bulk smokeless powder = Superior, Dense smokeless pistol powder = Undesirable. Poor only due to substantial pressures it produced which was not great to aged skinny cylinder wall revolvers. While Colt however manufactured their revolvers, because they did (as folks say for "black powder"), rifle manufactures significantly surpassed such production in 1894, while it took Colt virtually ten further years to perform exactly the same? Black powder rifles even now used the right smokeless powders...as Earlier talked about for each The subject issue...and so did handloaders for revolvers, along with UMC. Ignorance is bliss and it transpired a good deal by 1900, folks working with dense extremely speedy burning powders as "bulk for bulk" loads and blowing up the whole world. Precisely the same was happening In spite of the high-driven rifles.
Thunder River Renegades Posted April 27, 2023 You misinterpret my messages and intent. That which you do won't make me indignant in the least; it will require a good deal much more than another person's foolishness to make me offended. I just Assume what you're carrying out is foolish and dangerous for no very good cause. And yes, you can experience a motorcycle with out personal basic safety tools, or a motorcycle for that matter, and everybody else pays The prices for that EMS and emergency health and fitness expert services (by means of our insurance premiums and our very own medical charges) that would not are needed experienced you acted more responsibly.
Why? The Powder If Winchester's usage of the new "bulk for bulk" Dupont No. 1 Rifle smokeless powder established a lot less strain than black powder, why would Winchester frown on reloads because they bought most of the handloading things? To me, there was no encounter in loading smokeless powder At the moment. The powders had been new and when a person loaded that wrong "significant-electrical power" rifle powder, or an entire load of Bullseye or Exclusive....KABOOM!! Also, maybe illiteracy was a concern...1895...there were even now a lot of parents that could not read through....thus the load facts was gibberish! Kind of even now seams to be a problem now! The Dies The dies were not put in place for loading smokeless powder hundreds. With this kind of "bulk for bulk" smokeless powders available, exactly where the bullet sat along with the powder, the seating wasn't pretty as company along with the crimping process was a little diverse. Predominantly because of the including on the cannelure on the situation at The bottom of your bullet, but also perhaps due to crimping of The brand new "Metallic Patched" bullets that made use of a little various crimping approach.
A arrange for catastrophe. The they don't listen on the tiny print, "It isn't my problem" when a person could be the source of the problem, is ludicrous. We have been liable for what we do and we do bear responsibility for the final results of jumping up on our Beer Crate and telling all who'll listen "It is really Okay to leap in front of a Muni Bus." If Savy Jack hopes to run Smokeless ammunition thru HIS a hundred+ yr aged firearm, Choose it. It is really his dilemma when everything goes while in the toilette. more info It can also be viewed as HIS issue when another person is injured mainly because he stated "Select It" and they have been dumb more than enough to feel him.